No good deed goes unsubpoenaed.....
A journalism class at Northwestern University uncovers evidence suggesting a 31-year-old murder case convicted the wrong man....and the modern-day prosecutor who'd be responsible for conducting the potential retrial tries to subpoena the evidence --including the students' notes and grades-- to put it under lock and key.
Sounds like a lawyer-show TV plot, wherein the entire incident is neatly resolved with great justice attained and all loose ends tied up in 48 minutes.
But it's something that's happening right now in Chicago.
From the article:
“In 2003 Protess and his students began examining McKinney's case. Over three years of painstaking reporting, they unearthed startling new evidence: the prosecution's two main witnesses, 15 and 18 at the time of the trial, recanted their testimony during interviews with the students, claiming they were beaten by the police and intimidated into doctoring the facts; McKinney alleged that he was beaten with a pipe by a detective with a history of police brutality before signing a sham confession; TV logs proved that both witnesses were watching a boxing match at the time of the shooting and thus could not have seen the murder; an ex-gang member, Anthony Drake, confessed on tape to being at the murder scene, named two perpetrators and said McKinney was not involved; current and former residents of the neighborhood confirmed they heard Drake and two other suspects confess to Lundahl's murder.”
Also, here's an account from one of the students whose work is being subpoenaed: [
link]