What? Big Moore is being denied a broadcast of his film the night before elections? GASP! However could that occur. People pull this sort of thing on him all the time and all the the time he makes another film and all the time he gets even popular and this just happens again and again and again.

Farenheit 9/11 is largely a "seasonal" item, let's say. One could argue that Moore released it just in time to attempt to influence the elections, and maybe that was his intent, but I've seen no hard evidence of that just yet (shift in the polls, etc.). Then again, had he done some more fact-checking and less grand-standing maybe, just maybe, people would have taken him seriously.

Instead, what he produced was a film that had even far-left-leaning Americans crying foul.

My opinion is that Moore is much more motivated by the almighty dollar than he claims to be. After the elections, regardless of who wins, I would expect to see a sudden plunge in sales of his movie. The pay-per-view show would be a way to get one final buck out of his film before it largely is forgotten and unnecessary, even if Bush wins.

He has offered it to Sinclair Broadcasting (the same company that will be airing a reportedly anti-Kerry documentary a week or two before the election) for free, but it is doubtful that they will accept it. This is merely another stunt in my opinion.

You've really got to question the reliability of a movie that is used by the Cuban regime for anti-US propaganda: [link]

My instinct is that its another publicity stunt. Creating a little controversy, and especially making it seem like something's being censored, will cause people to clamor to get their hands on something. I had my suspicions when the movie first came out and Disney supposedly tried to pull the plug on distribution at the last minute. That seems like a manipulative move tailor-made to get liberals all riled up and eager to see it.

And all this time, I'd hoped to see a fair and balanced alternative to Sinclair Broadcasting (owner of several ABC and FOX stations, including ABC-6 and Fox-28 here in Columbus) who ordered all of their stations to air an anti-Kerry propaganda film during primetime. [link] This would be in violation of FEC (Federal Election Commission) laws. It's not the first time Sinclair has played the part of partison hack: they were charged earlier this year when they refused to air Democratic ads critical of Bush. (Of course, all the Bush ads ran without incident)

Yes, and all this time I've been waiting to see an alternative to CNN's pro-Kerry propaganda documentary "John Kerry: Born to Run". I know it was something like that. I can't remember the exact name, but the point is I haven't seen them run anything like that for Bush.

Also, think about those CNN employees who are helping out the Kerry campaign.

Just a few of my thoughts. Feel free to use anything I say to misquote, take out of context, and then use against me.

Happy trolling! :)

The reason no one does that for Bush is because Bush is a presidential flop.

Can't you ever just shut up and let me be right for once? I've found that even in light of absolutely indisputable evidence, you still seem to say I'm wrong. Do me a favor and move to France.

I will let you be right as soon as you're right. Do me a favor, move to Iraq, since they want American help so much they'll love you.

You missed the short bus to school again didn't you?

Kids these days...

Well if my stupid driver wasn't always bent over at your house maybe he'd come!

besides he is going to win anyway.we will steal the election if we have to.It is not that I am that fond of all of his decisions.but put yourself in his shoes.how would you do with the info and resources.then ask yourself how would kerry do.kerry has no place in power,he should just go and spend his wifes money.oh yeah I would like to cornhole that rich bitch

kerry is a toole